[Ipe-discuss] Ipe features (was Congratulations !!!!)
Pierre Boulenguez
boulenguez at cstb.fr
Mon Feb 21 09:54:27 CET 2005
Johan Ingvast a écrit :
>On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Otfried Cheong wrote:
>
>
>
>>>I really think Ipe deserve more audience
>>>
>>>
>>Thanks for the compliments, but please note that this version of Ipe is
>>still a preview - you should think about current Ipe users as beta
>>testers. They are used to Ipe crashing and misbehaving (at least they
>>don't complain very loudly). Before Ipe can handle a larger audience, it
>>needs to become more complete, and more robust.
>>
>>
>I must object. To me ipe is already very productive. There are a few
>things that make it crash, but I think I know most of those pitfalls.
>So if you don't object I recomend ipe whenever I get a chance. (not on the
>internet so far)
>
>
>
>>(In fact, the Ipe path object is much more general than you seem to think.)
>>
>>
>>
>>> * Edition of coordinates and other parameters of objects.
>>>
>>>
>>This is also already possible, but in a kind of geeky way: Select the
>>object(s), and do a "Copy". Then paste into your favorite text editor (I
>>use Emacs). Edit the XML description of the object(s), and copy them back
>>into Ipe the same way.
>>
>>
>This is wonderful. I had no idea this was possible, and I don't think you
>have it in the manual. This idea should be used much more often for
>different programs.
>
>
>
>>It would be nice to have a direct user interface for this. This should be
>>implemented by a volunteer as an Ipelet.
>>
>>
>I agree, and then it should be possible to use the same for templates and
>stylesheets.
>Are there any general xml-editors out there? Too me xml looks very regular
>so it should be possible to find an editor that works for all xml-code. I
>must admit that I have looked for such an editor without success, but
>maybe I don't know exactly what to look for.
>
>With an xml-editor I don't mean a plain editor that puts colors on the
>marks but something more advanced that remembers what different variables
>can be stored in different marks (I don't know the correct names for
>xml-marks) This way when adding a new mark the editor would propose
>properties to go with it.
>
>If such an editor can be found then making this Ipelet should be a piece
>of cace.
>
>
>
>>> * Intersection snap only work on lines, extend to other objects.
>>>
>>>
>>One of the still missing features (see Ipe bugzilla #23)
>>
>>
>Do you plan to make it possible to have the F3 possible to snap to a
>polyline?
>The scissors does not work on polylines. Is that related?
>
>
>
>>> * More and nicer arrow.
>>>
>>>
>>Also on my list of things to do (just entered it in Ipe bugzilla #82)
>>
>>
>I'd like to suggest the standard arrow for metapost which works for most
>curved lines.
>
>
>
>>> * More visually appealing selection mode.
>>>
>>>
>>Please start a discussion about that on this list, let's see whether we
>>can come to a consensus what selection should look like.
>>
>>
>
>What do you mean by visually appealing? After having started to use the
>third button for selection I think selection works as good as it could.
>Scrolling through different objects with the space bar takes some time to
>get used to but then works fine.
>
>/johan
>
>
>
Ok Mr Cheong, forget about the congratulations, ...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: boulenguez.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 437 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/ipe-discuss/attachments/20050221/fdaeaf8a/attachment.vcf
More information about the Ipe-discuss
mailing list