No subject

[Arisaema Enthusiast Group (AEG) Discussion List (and other=]

hardy  Aroids)" <ARISAEMA-L at NIC.SURFNET.NL> Aroids)" <ARISAEMA-L at NIC.SURFNET.NL>
Sender: "Arisaema Enthusiast Group (AEG) Discussion List (and other=
From: DrR Hamilton <robhamilton at TRUMP.NET.AU>
Subject: Re: Arisaema  bogneri ?
In-Reply-To: <000d01c18929$b08d4fc0$65c9f1c3 at ws>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transf er-encoding: 7bit

Hi Wilbert,

>
> It seems that bogneri is a superfluous species and indeed fits well the
> total pattern of variation in franchetianum (incl. fargesii). It would =be
> interesting though if you could provide us with scans of the flower, si=nce
> this may obviously represent some of the "original" material on which t=he
> name Ar. bogneri was based.

I  will  photograph  this  weekend.

> Did you, per chance, also get some material from Greg of a Typhonium he
> collected on the same trip? One that produces bulbils in the leaf stalk=s? I
> have never been able to contact Greg again since many months. This Typh=onium
> was later published as Sauromatum gaoligongense by Li Heng. Peter Boyce=and
> I reduced it to Typhonium.

Unfortunately  no  -  but I  will make  some enquiries about  its  existe=nce
and  let  you  know.


Rob