A. verrucosum, A. utile, A. griffithii, & vars.

[guy gusman]

>Ray:
>
>I think you misunderstood my question; Wilbert had labeled his pictures as
>Arisaema (griffithii) cf. verrucosum. This is quite a different beast
>nomenclature-wise from A. griffithii v. verrucosum (I think...). Hence my
>confusion.
>
>Any further thoughts? Guy?
>
>--Roy

OK. I'm sure Wilbert spoke of a verrucose form of A. griffithii.