A. verrucosum, A. utile, A. griffithii, & vars.
ggusman at ULB.AC.BE
Sat Feb 13 11:58:25 CET 1999
>I think you misunderstood my question; Wilbert had labeled his pictures as
>Arisaema (griffithii) cf. verrucosum. This is quite a different beast
>nomenclature-wise from A. griffithii v. verrucosum (I think...). Hence my
>Any further thoughts? Guy?
OK. I'm sure Wilbert spoke of a verrucose form of A. griffithii.
More information about the Arisaema-L