[Ipe-discuss] problems compiling

Dominik Szczerba domi at vision.ee.ethz.ch
Mon Jul 17 14:11:01 CEST 2006


Hi,
Why does ipe disregard newline (\\) latex command?
thanks
Dominik

Dominik Szczerba wrote:
> The problem was the system version of libipe, if it's removed custom
> build from sources runs fine with latex.
> Thanks Steve!
> Dominik
> 
> Dominik Szczerba wrote:
>> Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 10:37:29PM +0200, Dominik Szczerba wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> The precompiled versions of ipe (debian) fail to show my latex inputs
>>>> because of freetype incompatibilities (header versus library).
>>>
>>> Coincidentally, I just uploaded a new version of Ipe to Debian
>>> today that fixes this bug.  Hopefully a simple update will fix
>>> your problem.
>>
>> I will test it as soon as I can download it.
>>
>>
>>
>>>> I succeed to build from source but fail to run because of the following
>>>> issues:
>>>>
>>>> - even though I specified IPEPREFIX to be /usr/local (in config.pri) the
>>>> program exits complaining that /usr/share/ipe is not there.
>>>>
>>>> - if I hack and move the properly installed /usr/local/share/ipe to
>>>> /usr/share the program exits complaining that fontmap.xml is not found -
>>>> and indeed, there is none. If I brutally copy the urw-fontmap.xml from
>>>> the source archive onto fontmap.xml ipe segfaults.
>>>>
>>>> Any ideas?
>>>
>>> If you're using a debian system, it's pretty easy to rebuild it from
>>> the Debianized sources which may be obtained using "apt-get source ipe".
>>
>> I tried that, it exhibits the same problems as the original source
>> archive: /usr/share hardcoded in (I want it in /usr/local/share and
>> chose so in config), no fontmap.xml, segfault on symbolic link and
>> renaming of *-fontmap.xml.
>>
>> regards,
>> Dominik
>>
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> -Steve
>>
> 

-- 
Dominik Szczerba, Ph.D.
Computer Vision Lab CH-8092 Zurich
http://www.vision.ee.ethz.ch/~domi



More information about the Ipe-discuss mailing list