No subject

[k.roberts at actrix.co.nz]

hardy  Aroids)" <ARISAEMA-L at NIC.SURFNET.NL>
From: Kim Roberts <k.roberts at ACTRIX.CO.NZ>
Subject: Re: The Seedex
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transf er-Encoding: 7bit

Ray,
30 lashes accepted.
I for one am certainly not complaining. I'm tied up with seed distributio=n
for NZAGS for considerably more than 200
odd members so know what a huge amount of work is involved.
Many thanks to all involved.
Shall I send a further response to Keith direct or will my original respo=nse
do?
Regards,
Kim

----- Original Message -----
From: "George R. Stilwell, Jr." <GRSJr at WORLDNET.ATT.NET>
To: <ARISAEMA-L at NIC.SURFNET.NL>
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 12:02 AM
Subject: The Seedex


> AEG members:
>
> While I'm on the subject of hitting the delete button, you people are
> amazing. It takes literally hundreds of hours by volunteers to do the
> AEG Seedex and all I hear is complaints when a mistake is made.
> Keep it up and there'll be no more seedexes.
>
> Besides, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize you should respo=nd
> to a request about Seedex preferences to the Seedex people not to
> Arisaema-L. The address is in the original request
>
> >From:  Keith La Rocque <channa21 at HOTMAIL.COM>
>
> Yet only one member was bright enough to reply that way.
>
> So who is to blame for stuffed mailboxes? Those who unthinkingly
> responded to the list of course.
>
> Who is ranting and raving against these respondents? No one.
>
> It's easier to destroy the volunteers who make the Seedex possible.
> Makes me want to leave AEG and Arisaema-L too.
>
> I believe those who have complained owe Keith an apology.
>
> Those who responded to Arisaema-L need 30 lashes for stupidity.
>
> Ray
>