No subject

Arisaema Enthusiast Group (AEG) Discussion List (and other= Arisaema Enthusiast Group (AEG) Discussion List (and other=
Sun May 31 15:22:33 CEST 1998


hardy  Aroids)" <ARISAEMA-L at NIC.SURFNET.NL> Aroids)" <ARISAEMA-L at NIC.SURFNET.NL>
Sender: "Arisaema Enthusiast Group (AEG) Discussion List (and other=
From: Rand Nicholson <writserv at NBNET.NB.CA>
Subject: Re: Arisaema franchetifargesiianum
In-Reply-To: <l03110702b19662f5bd5f@[24.128.114.193]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi Roy:

>Do we have two species here? I think so. Tony: did you wind up with two
>different types from your collections? My question to Guy (or any other
>expert) is what characteristic does one use to key out fargesii and
>franchetianum? As for stunning, I found my 'pseudofranchetianum' (probab=ly
>true franchetianum) to be far more interesting than the ho-hum (but nice=)
>fargesii type.
>
>--Roy Herold
>N. Reading, MA

So, the photo at  http://www.mdc.net/~rrh/arfranch.html is a franchetianu=m?
And the one at http://gen.ml.org/~rrh/ar101303a1.jpg is a fargesii? Or no=?

I have a fargesii coming up and I am told that there is a possibility tha=t
it is A. franchetianum. Having just visited the links above I am not sure
what to hope for.

Kind Regards,

Rand

Rand Nicholson
New Brunswick
Maritime Canada, Z 5b
<writserv at nbnet.nb.ca>



More information about the Arisaema-L mailing list