No subject

Arisaema Enthusiast Group (AEG) Discussion List (and other= Arisaema Enthusiast Group (AEG) Discussion List (and other=
Wed Jun 17 04:59:34 CEST 1998


hardy  Aroids)" <ARISAEMA-L at NIC.SURFNET.NL> Aroids)" <ARISAEMA-L at NIC.SURFNET.NL>
Sender: "Arisaema Enthusiast Group (AEG) Discussion List (and other=
From: "Jim McClements, Dover, DE z6" <JimMcClem at AOL.COM>
Subject: Re: Pinellia
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transf er-encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 61698 8:15:28 AM, you wrote:

<< share Jim's interest in the "obscure Pinellia species."  Besides the f=our
common ones Jim mentions, TROPICOS lists four other  species as apparentl=y
valid (P. cochinchinensis, fornicata, integrifolia and peltata), however,=the
citation for P. cochinchinensis Wright is merely to a list of seeds recei=ved
from "Siagon, Cochin, China."  It gives as a synonym for this species Ari=saema
cochinchinensis Blume, changes the genus to Pinellia, credits W.F.Wright,=but
gives no citation.  Is this a valid citation?

Does anyone know of sources for these other species?

Clarence Waldron
cwaldron at powersupply.net


Clarence

Kaichen is offering Pinellia integrifolia on their '98 list. Of course, l=ast
year they offered both it and P. peltata, but, as far as I know, no one e=ver
received either.

The other two are new names to me, but fornicata certainly sounds interes=ting.

Jim



More information about the Arisaema-L mailing list