No subject

[Arisaema Enthusiast Group (AEG) Discussion List (and other=]

hardy  Aroids)" <ARISAEMA-L at NIC.SURFNET.NL> Aroids)" <ARISAEMA-L at NIC.SURFNET.NL>
Sender: "Arisaema Enthusiast Group (AEG) Discussion List (and other=
From: Wilbert Hetterscheid <hetter at WORLDONLINE.NL>
Subject: Re: Arisaema franchetifargesiianum
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Tony,

After my investigation into the franchetianum business (see longer
message), I think:

>>http://www.mdc.net/~rrh/arfranch.html are really fargesii,

that the upper one of these two photos (the one with the two inflors) wou=ld
qualify as franchetianum in the sense of having a long caudate spathe tip
and as such conforming to "purpureogaleatum", although the spathe isn't a=s
"galeate" as one would expect. maybe a matter of immaturity. The other
inflor on this page could be fargesii but we need internal structures.

>and the other one (wider spadix) is A. fargesii

>>http://gen.ml.org/~rrh/ar101303a1.jpg is really franchetianum.

As I said in my previous mail, I too think that 101303a1 may be
franchetianum, as it seems to represent the "purpureogaleatum" aspect to
the full.

Cheers,
Wilbert